4.3 Article

Abundance of white lace lerp psyllids on understorey and canopy river red gums and relationships with foliar sugars and tannins

期刊

AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST ENTOMOLOGY
卷 25, 期 1, 页码 20-37

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/afe.12528

关键词

intraspecific heterogeneity; leaf senescence; plant resistance; sub-individual heterogeneity; wounding responses

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Canopy leaves of Eucalyptus camaldulensis are more suitable for the survival and oviposition of Cardiaspina albitextura nymphs compared to understorey leaves. The diversity of foliar sugars and the abundance of ellagitannins influence the abundance of the psyllid nymphs.
1. Trees present herbivorous insects with the greatest diversity of resources of any plant growth form. Both ontogeny and shading can alter suitability for arboreal insect herbivores. 2. We conducted a longitudinal study of tagged 'mature' (>12 months old) Eucalyptus camaldulensis leaves to compare the suitability of understorey and canopy trees for the leaf senescence-inducing psyllid, Cardiaspina albitextura. We quantified sugars and tannins as possible predictors of nymphal abundance. 3. Canopy leaves hosted double the number of nymphs as understorey leaves. Variation among individual trees (understorey and canopy) was the most important source of heterogeneity explaining psyllid abundance, although relative leaf age significantly influenced oviposition on canopy leaves. The diversity of foliar sugars was higher among canopy leaves than among understorey leaves. There was significant between-tree diversity in total hydrolysable tannins (HTs) and total condensed tannins (CTs) among understorey trees but not among canopy trees. Heterogeneity among understorey and canopy trees was explained by greater diversity of ellagitannins (HTs) than of CTs. 4. Shading is detrimental to the survival of nymphs on both host types, but sugars are unlikely to explain variation in suitability. Vescalagin (an ellagitannin) was negatively correlated with the abundance of nymphs on both host types.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据