期刊
AGE AND AGEING
卷 51, 期 6, 页码 -出版社
OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afac120
关键词
outdoor mobility; rehabilitation; physical activity; walking; social; older people; systematic review
This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of community-based rehabilitation interventions incorporating outdoor mobility on physical activity, endurance, outdoor mobility, and falls-related self-efficacy in older adults. Through systematic search and meta-analysis, it was found that reactive rehabilitation measures had positive effects on physical activity, endurance, and outdoor mobility, while proactive rehabilitation measures had some benefits on physical activity and outdoor mobility. However, the effects on falls-related self-efficacy were not significant. Future research should focus on walking programs for proactive populations and address mobility-related anxiety.
Objective:To determine the effectiveness of community-based rehabilitation interventions which incorporate outdoor mobility on physical activity, endurance, outdoor mobility and falls-related self-efficacy in older adults. Design: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PEDro and OpenGrey were searched systematically from inception to June 2021 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of community-based rehabilitation incorporating outdoor mobility on physical activity, endurance, outdoor mobility and/or falls-related self-efficacy in older adults. Duplicate screening, selection, extraction and appraisal were completed. Results were reported descriptively and with random-effects meta-analyses stratified by population (proactive [community-dwelling], reactive [illness/injury]). Results A total of 29 RCTs with 7,076 participants were identified (66% high bias for at least one domain). Results: A total of 29 RCTs 7,076 participants were identified (66% high bias for at least one domain). The outdoor mobility component was predominantly a walking programme with behaviour change. Rehabilitation for reactive populations increased physical activity (seven RCTs, 587 participants. Hedge's g 1.32, 95% CI: 0.31, 2.32), endurance (four RCTs, 392 participants. Hedges g 0.24; 95% CI: 0.04, 0.44) and outdoor mobility (two RCTs with 663 participants. Go out as much as wanted, likelihood of a journey) at intervention end versus usual care. Where reported, effects were preserved at follow-up. One RCT indicated a benefit of rehabilitation for proactive populations on moderate-to-vigorous activity and outdoor mobility. No effect was noted for falls-related self-efficacy, or other outcomes following rehabilitation for proactive populations. Conclusion: Reactive rehabilitation for older adults may include walking programmes with behaviour change techniques. Future research should address the potential benefit of a walking programme for proactive populations and address mobility-related anxiety as a barrier to outdoor mobility for both proactive and reactive populations.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据