4.7 Article

Silver-Catalyzed Asymmetric Aldol Reaction of Isocyanoacetic Acid Derivatives Enabled by Cooperative Participation of Classical and Nonclassical Hydrogen Bonds

期刊

ADVANCED SYNTHESIS & CATALYSIS
卷 364, 期 14, 页码 2333-2339

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adsc.202200327

关键词

silver catalysis; asymmetric aldol reaction; oxazolines; DFT calculation; noncovalent interactions

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [JP18H03906, JP21H04680, JP20H04797, JP20H02729, JP20K15268]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The silver-catalyzed asymmetric aldol reaction of isocyanoacetic acid derivatives with aldehydes has been developed using a chiral prolinol-phosphine ligand as a hydrogen-bond-donating P,N,O ligand. DFT calculations revealed a stepwise reaction mechanism, involving C-C bond formation and subsequent enantioselectivity-determining ring formation. The prolinol moiety of the ligand activates the aldehyde through a two-point hydrogen bond, facilitating the stereocontrolled cyclization. Additional nonclassical hydrogen bonds and London dispersion interactions may also contribute to stereocontrol.
The silver-catalyzed asymmetric aldol reaction of isocyanoacetic acid derivatives with aldehydes has been developed by employing a chiral prolinol-phosphine as a hydrogen-bond-donating P,N,O ligand. DFT calculations indicated that the reaction proceeds in a stepwise manner, involving C-C bond forming carbonyl addition and subsequent enantioselectivity-determining oxazoline ring formation. An O-H center dot center dot center dot O/sp(3) -C-H center dot center dot center dot O two-point hydrogen bond donated by the prolinol moiety of the ligand activates the aldehyde in the C-C bond formation step and facilitates the subsequent cyclization under stereocontrol by the catalyst. The calculations further suggest that additional nonclassical C-H center dot center dot center dot O hydrogen bonds as well as London dispersion interactions may also participate synergistically in the stereocontrol.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据