4.8 Article

On the Stability of Non-fullerene Acceptors and Their Corresponding Organic Solar Cells: Influence of Side Chains

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 32, 期 43, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202206042

关键词

light stability; non-fullerene acceptors; operational stability; thermal stability

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52073221]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the degradation of a series of Y-family NFAs with varying side-chains under multiple stresses. The results show that NFAs with shorter side chains exhibit higher stability and hinder the formation of large phase-separated NFA domains, leading to improved operational stability of organic solar cells.
Side chain engineering is a widely explored strategy in the molecular design for non-fullerene acceptors (NFAs). Although the relationship between side chain structures and optoelectronic properties of NFAs is well clarified, the effect of side chain structures on the stability of NFAs and their corresponding organic solar cells (OSCs) is rarely reported. Herein, a series of Y-family NFAs with varying side-chains are studied to investigate their degradation upon multiple stresses including water, oxygen from ambient, chemical environment from ZnO electron transport layer, temperature, and ultraviolet light. The results show that all of these Y-family NFAs are highly stable against water and oxygen in ambient dark condition, while their photochemical and thermal stabilities decrease with the increasing side chain length. NFAs with shorter side chains are not only more resistant to photo-oxidation and photocatalytic reactions, but also can hamper the formation of large phase-separated NFA domains upon storage in both glovebox and ambient conditions. As such, the PM6:NFA OSC with short side-chain NFA also exhibits superior operational stability, associating with a higher T-80 lifetime. This study demonstrates that the side chains must be considered to obtain stable OSCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据