4.6 Article

Solid Lubrication Performance of Few- and Multilayer Ti3C2Tx Coatings

期刊

ADVANCED ENGINEERING MATERIALS
卷 24, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adem.202200755

关键词

functional coatings; MXenes; solid lubrication; Ti3C2Tx nanosheets; tribology

资金

  1. ANID-Chile within the projects Fondequip [EQM190057]
  2. Fondecyt [1220331]
  3. ANID-Chile within the project Fondecyt Postdoctorado [3210052, 3220165]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multilayer Ti3C2TX nanosheets have gained attention due to their ability to form beneficial tribolayers. This study compares the solid lubrication ability of spray-coated few- or multilayer Ti3C2Tx coatings and finds that multilayer Ti3C2Tx nanosheets exhibit superior tribological performance compared to few-layer MXenes, which show continuously rising frictional values.
Multilayer Ti3C2TX nanosheets (MXenes) have gained notable attention in the tribological community due to their outstanding wear resistance induced by their ability to form beneficial tribolayers. Regarding delaminated, few-layer Ti3C2Tx nanosheets, much less knowledge about their tribological performance is available. Therefore, this study aims at comparing the solid lubrication ability of spray-coated few- or multilayer Ti3C2Tx coatings (dispersion concentrations of 2 and 5 mg mL(-1)). Linear-reciprocating ball-on-disk tests are conducted using normal loads of 100 and 200 mN. The results clearly demonstrate the superior tribological performance of multilayer Ti3C2Tx nanosheets, inducing a low, stable, and reproducible evolution of the coefficient of friction. This holds particularly true for coatings fabricated with the lower concentrated dispersion, which are characterized by a reduced coating thickness and less lubricious material. In contrast, few-layer MXenes, irrespective of the coating thickness and available amount of lubricious material (dispersion concentration), demonstrate continuously rising frictional values, which can be traced back to the nanosheets' degradation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据