4.5 Review

Association between obstructive sleep apnea and cardiovascular diseases

期刊

ACTA BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA SINICA
卷 54, 期 7, 页码 882-892

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.3724/abbs.2022084

关键词

obstructive sleep apnea; cardiovascular disease; pathophysiology; continuous positive airway pressure therapy

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [82130011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common respiratory disorder closely associated with cardiovascular diseases. Early diagnosis and appropriate treatment are essential for preventing adverse clinical outcomes.
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common respiratory disorder characterized by partial obstruction of upper respiratory tract and repetitive cessation of breathing during sleep. The etiology behind OSA is associated with the occurrence of intermittent hypoxemia, recurrent arousals and intrathoracic pressure swings. These contributing factors may turn on various signaling mechanisms including elevated sympathetic tone, oxidative stress, inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, cardiovascular variability, abnormal coagulation and metabolic defect ( e. g., insulin resistance, leptin resistance and altered hepatic metabolism). Given its close tie with major cardiovascular risk factors, OSA is commonly linked to the pathogenesis of a wide array of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) including hypertension, heart failure, arrhythmias, coronary artery disease, stroke, cerebrovascular disease and pulmonary hypertension (PH). The current standard treatment for OSA using adequate nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) confers a significant reduction in cardiovascular morbidity. Nonetheless, despite the availability of effective therapy, patients with CVDs are still deemed highly vulnerable to OSA and related adverse clinical outcomes. A better understanding of the etiology of OSA along with early diagnosis should be essential for this undertreated disorder in the clinical setting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据