4.8 Article

Charged Nanochannels in Covalent Organic Framework Membranes Enabling Efficient Ion Exclusion

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 16, 期 8, 页码 11781-11791

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.2c04767

关键词

charged nanochannel; covalent organic framework membrane; nanoconfined electrostatic interaction; ion exclusion; nanofiltration

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21878215]
  2. Key Research and Development Program of Zhejiang Province [2021C03173]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ionic covalent organic framework membranes (iCOFMs) with charged framework nanochannels and high charge density have been developed to control ion transport. These membranes enable ion exclusion while maintaining high water permeability, and hold great potential for water purification, ionic separation, sensing, and energy conversion.
ABSTRACT: Controllable ion transport through nanochannels is crucial for biological and artificial membrane systems. Covalent organic frameworks (COFs) with regular and tunable nanochannels are emerging as an ideal material platform to develop synthetic membranes for ion transport. However, ion exclusion by COF membranes remains challenging because most COF materials have large-sized nanochannels leading to nonselective transport of small ions. Here we develop ionic COF membranes (iCOFMs) to control ion transport through charged framework nanochannels, the interior surfaces of which are covered with arrayed sulfonate groups to render superior charge density. The overlap of an electrical double layer in charged nanochannels blocks the entry of co-ions, narrows their passageways, and concomitantly restrains the permeation of counterions via the charge balance. These highly charged large-sized nanochannels within the iCOFM enable ion exclusion while maintaining intrinsically high water permeability. Our results reveal possibilities for controllable ion transport based on COF membranes for water purification, ionic separation, sensing, and energy conversion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据