4.7 Article

Comparison of Phenotypic Tests and an Immunochromatographic Assay and Development of a New Algorithm for Detection of OXA-48-like Carbapenemases

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 55, 期 3, 页码 877-883

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01929-16

关键词

OXA-48; OXA-48; K-SeT; carbapenemase; faropenem; temocillin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OXA-48 is the most prevalent carbapenemase in Enterobacteriaceae in Europe and the Middle East, but it is frequently missed because many isolates display low MICs for carbapenems. Furthermore, in contrast to metallo-beta-lactamases or Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemases (KPC), no specific inhibitor is available for the phenotypic detection of OXA-48. Molecular detection of blaOXA-48 is the gold standard but is not available in many laboratories. A few phenotypic assays have been described but have not been independently evaluated. The aim of this study was the systematic comparison of phenotypic tests and an immunochromatographic assay (ICT) for the detection of OXA-48/OXA-48-like carbapenemases and the development of an algorithm for reliable phenotypic detection of OXA-48. Four phenotypic tests (temocillin disk test, faropenem disk test, OXA-48 disk test, and high-inoculum [HI] OXA-48 disk test) and a new ICT (OXA-48 K-SeT) were compared by using a set of 166 Enterobacteriaceae isolates, including isolates producing OXA-48/OXA-48-like carbapenemases (n = 84) or Ambler class A and B carbapenemases (n = 41) and carbapenemase-negative isolates (n = 41). The sensitivity and specificity for the different assays were 100% and 43.9% for temocillin, 57.1% and 98.8% for faropenem, 53.6% and 100% for the OXA-48 disk test, 98.8% and 97.6% for the HI OXA-48 disk test, and 100% and 100% for the ICT, respectively. The ICT displayed the highest sensitivity and specificity and was the most rapid assay, but it is more costly than phenotypic assays. Based on these results, a new algorithm incorporating temocillin, faropenem, and ICT which allows cost-effective detection of OXA-48 with 100% sensitivity and specificity was developed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据