4.2 Article

Inherently Chiral 6,7-Diphenyldibenzo [e,g][1,4]diazocine: Enantioselective Synthesis and Application as a Ligand Platform

期刊

CCS CHEMISTRY
卷 5, 期 4, 页码 982-993

出版社

CHINESE CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.31635/ccschem.022.202201901

关键词

inherent chirality; enantioselective synthesis; 6,7-diphenyldibenzo[e,g][1,4]diazocine; chiral phosphoric acid; chiral phosphorus ligand

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, inherently chiral 6,7-diphenyldibenzo[e,g][1,4]diazocine (DDD) was synthesized enantioselectively for the first time using chiral phosphoric acid (CPA) as a catalyst. The reaction yielded 82% of the desired product with a 98% enantiomeric excess. The method could also be applied to racemic biaryl diamines through kinetic resolution. DDD's high energy barriers and chemical stability make it an ideal platform for developing new chiral ligands and catalysts.
Inherently chiral 6,7-diphenyldibenzo[e,g][1,4]diazocine (DDD) has been synthesized enantioselectively for the first time via chiral phosphoric acid (CPA)-catalyzed cyclocondensation of readily available [1,1'-biphenyl]-2,2'-diamine (1a) and benzil (2a) in 82% yield, with 98% ee under mild reaction conditions. The strategy could also be applied to racemic biaryl diamines through kinetic resolution. The unexpectedly high interconversion energy barriers between the enantiomers (Delta G = 39.5 kcal/mol) and the chemical stability rendered DDD an ideal platform for developing new chiral ligands and catalysts. Unique inherently chiral DDD-based phosphoramidites, phosphoric acid, mono- and diphosphine ligands were prepared from optically pure diphenol derivative DDDOL as a common precursor. Preliminary asymmetric reactions catalyzed by Pd or Rh in the presence of newly developed ligands exhibited comparable or even better enantioselectivities than the corresponding BINOL- or SPINOL-derived ligands. Density functional theory calculation revealed the origin of the enantioselectivity during the process. [GRAPHICS]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据