4.8 Article

Disabled homolog 2 controls macrophage phenotypic polarization and adipose tissue inflammation

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 126, 期 4, 页码 1311-1322

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI79590

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH Cardiovascular Training grant [5T32 HL007284]
  2. NIH Immunology Training grant [5T32AI007496]
  3. NIH [R01 DK096076, R01 HL084422, R01 AI-15608, Hl-33391]
  4. American Heart Association

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Acute and chronic tissue injury results in the generation of a myriad of environmental cues that macrophages respond to by changing their phenotype and function. This phenotypic regulation is critical for controlling tissue inflammation and resolution. Here, we have identified the adaptor protein disabled homolog 2 (DAB2) as a regulator of phenotypic switching in macrophages. Dab2 expression was upregulated in M2 macrophages and suppressed in M1 macrophages isolated from both mice and humans, and genetic deletion of Dab2 predisposed macrophages to adopt a proinflammatory M1 phenotype. In mice with myeloid cell-specific deletion of Dab2 (Dab2(fi/fi) Lysm-Cre), treatment with sublethal doses of LPS resulted in increased proinflammatory gene expression and macrophage activation. Moreover, chronic high-fat feeding exacerbated adipose tissue inflammation, M1 polarization of adipose tissue macrophages, and the development of insulin resistance in DAB2-deficient animals compared with controls. Mutational analyses revealed that DAB2 interacts with TNF receptor-associated factor 6 (TRAF6) and attenuates I kappa B kinase beta-dependent (IKK beta-dependent) phosphorylation of Ser536 in the transactivation domain of NF-kappa B p65. Together, these findings reveal that DAB2 is critical for controlling inflammatory signaling during phenotypic polarization of macrophages and suggest that manipulation of DAB2 expression and function may hold therapeutic potential for the treatment of acute and chronic inflammatory disorders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据