3.8 Review

Evidence for the development of skills for education, leadership and innovation through experiential-based foundational pharmacy residency programs: a narrative review

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE AND RESEARCH
卷 52, 期 3, 页码 180-195

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jppr.1804

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The article describes the evidence for the effectiveness of a post-graduate experiential learning program, such as a foundational pharmacy residency, in supporting early-career pharmacists' competency development in education, leadership, and innovation. The study found that residency programs have successfully fostered these skills through various activities and courses, although the extent of success varies.
Aim: The aim of this narrative literature review was to describe the existing evidence for a post-graduate experiential learning program, such as a foundational pharmacy residency, to support the competency development for early-career pharmacists in conducting education, leadership and supporting innovation. Methods: We identified publications that addressed research in skills development within foundational pharmacy residency programs. Articles were identified using the databases Scopus and Embase. Results: It was found that foundational residency programs have supported competency development in delivering education, leadership and management, and support of innovation and quality improvement. Residency programs have fostered these skills development through the use of courses, assessments and activities, but to varying degrees. Many of these skills are attained as a benefit of inclusion and mentorship in non-clinical tasks. Conclusion: Residency programs can serve as a strong platform for the development of non-clinical skills in education, leadership and innovation. A mix of activities and course-specific skills building courses have demonstrated levels of success in developing skills in education, leadership and innovation when implemented.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据