4.7 Article

Effects of Resveratrol on Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
卷 101, 期 11, 页码 4322-4328

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2016-1858

关键词

-

资金

  1. Adamed sp. z o.o., Adamed Group (Czosnow, Poland)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common endocrinopathy affecting women of reproductive age. Hyperandrogenism is the central feature of PCOS. Studies on isolated ovarian theca-interstitial cells suggest that resveratrol, a natural polyphenol, reduces androgen production. Objective: This study was designed to evaluate endocrine and metabolic effects of resveratrol on PCOS. Design and Setting: This was a randomized (1:1) double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that evaluated the effects of resveratrol over a period of 3 months in an academic hospital. Patients and Other Participants: Subjects with PCOS were identified according to the Rotterdam criteria. Thirty-four subjects were enrolled and 30 subjects completed the trial. Evaluations were performed at baseline and repeated after 3 months of treatment. Intervention: Resveratrol (1,500 mg p.o.) or placebo were administered daily. Main Outcome Measure: Primary outcome was the change in the serum total T. Results: Resveratrol treatment led to a significant decrease of total T by 23.1% (P =.01). In parallel, resveratrol induced a 22.2% decrease of dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (P =.01), a decrease of fasting insulin level by 31.8% (P =.007) and an increase of the Insulin Sensitivity Index (Matsuda and DeFronzo) by 66.3% (P =.04). Levels of gonadotropins, the lipid profile as well as markers of inflammation and endothelial function were not significantly altered. Conclusions: Resveratrol significantly reduced ovarian and adrenal androgens. This effect may be, at least in part, related to an improvement of insulin sensitivity and a decline of insulin level.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据