4.0 Article

Study of nickel adsorption on NaCl-modified natural zeolite using response surface methodology and kinetics modeling

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gsd.2022.100757

关键词

Na-mordenite; Box-behnken design; Adsorption; Heavy metals; Optimization; Natural zeolite

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, an Algerian zeolite was activated and tested for its nickel adsorption ability in aqueous solution. The results showed that the Na-mordenite had a high specific surface area and a total pore volume. The optimal conditions for nickel adsorption were determined using a Box-Behnken Design and the experimental data agreed well with the predicted values. Kinetic and isotherm studies revealed that the Avrami kinetic model and Redlich-Peterson isotherm best described the experimental data. The mechanism of nickel adsorption by Na-mordenite was found to involve electrostatic and ion-exchange processes.
In this study, a natural Algerian zeolite of the mordenite type was activated and tested for nickel adsorption in aqueous solution. Na-mordenite was characterized by different techniques, such as X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) analysis shows that this mineral was a micro-meso-macroporous material with a high specific surface area (S-BET = 124.95 m(2)/g) and a total pore volume of 0.45 cm(3)/g. Box-Behnken Design (BBD) was used to optimize the adsorption process. The optimal conditions predicted by the model were: initial concentration -10 mg/L; adsorbent content -0.32 g/L; and pH of nickel solution -5.27. Under these conditions, the experimental value of nickel removal (R = 95.13%) was in good agreement with the predicted value (R = 96.71%). Kinetic and isotherm studies revealed that the Avrami kinetic model and Redlich-Peterson isotherm best expressed the experimental data. Based on the X-Ray Fluorescence results and zeta potential measurements, the mechanism of nickel adsorption by Na-mordenite appears to be an electrostatic and ion-exchange process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据