3.8 Article

Effects of additional context information in prescription drug information sheets on comprehension and risk and efficacy perceptions

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1186/s40545-021-00386-9

关键词

Patient medication information; Context; Risk comprehension

资金

  1. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, FDA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that additional explanatory text in a patient medication handout can decrease patients' comprehension of side effect information and affect their perceptions of risk. The method of delivery, whether online or through the mail, can also have different effects on risk perceptions.
Objective To determine how additional explanatory text (context) about drug side effects in a patient medication information handout affected comprehension and perceptions of risk and efficacy. Methods We conducted an online experiment with a national sample of 1,119 U.S. adults with rheumatoid arthritis and related conditions, sampled through random-digit dialing, address-based sampling, and online ads. We randomized participants to receive one of several versions of a patient information handout for a fictitious drug, either with or without additional context, then measured comprehension and other outcomes. Results Additional qualitative context about warnings and side effects resulted in lower comprehension of side effect information, but not information about uses of the drug or warnings. The effect of additional context on risk perceptions depended on whether the medication handout was delivered online or through the mail. Those who received a hardcopy of the handout with additional context had higher perceived risk of side effects than those who saw the version without additional context. Conclusion More clarifying information is not always better and may lead to cognitive overload, inhibiting comprehension. Practice implications Additional research should further explore effects of context in online vs. hard-copy formats before practice implications can be determined.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据