4.6 Article

Does the perioperative analgesic/anesthetic regimen influence the prevalence of long-term chronic pain after mastectomy?

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA
卷 33, 期 -, 页码 20-25

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.07.010

关键词

Chronic postsurgical pain; Chronic postmastectomy pain; Postoperative pain; Breast cancer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Study Objective: To investigate if the anesthetic/analgesic regimen is associated with the risk of reporting long-term chronic postmastectomy pain (CPMP). Design: Cross-sectional survey Setting: Academic hospital Patients: A total of 267 women having undergone mastectomy with axillary lymph node dissection between 2003 and 2008 Interventions: All patients were contacted between October and December 2012, with a questionnaire asking for persistent pain after surgery and its characteristics. Measurements: Besides demographical data, tumor characteristics, and adjuvant treatment, we recorded type and doses of intraoperative anesthetics/analgesics (sufentanil, ketamine, clonidine, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, MgSO4, propofol, or halogenated agents). Results: Of the 128 patients returning analrnble questionnaires, 43.8% reported chronic pain (48.2% with neuropathic characteristics). Multivariate logistic/linear regression model showed 4 factors independently associated with persistent pain: recall of preoperative pain (odds ratio [OR], 1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-1.48), chemotherapy (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.13-1.55), need for strong opioids in postanesthesia care unit (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.11-1.53), and halogenated agent anesthesia (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.70-0.95). Conclusion: In conclusion, our study confirms the high prevalence of CPMP, 4 to 9 years after surgery. Recall of preoperative pain, chemotherapy, and need for strong opioids in the postanesthesia care unit were all associated with the presence of chronic pain. Of the intraoperative analgesics/anesthetics studied, only use of halogenated agents was associated with a lower prevalence of CPMP. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据