4.7 Article

Suppression of Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation Variability at Increased CO2

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLIMATE
卷 29, 期 11, 页码 4155-4164

出版社

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0533.1

关键词

-

资金

  1. NOAA [NA13OAR4310129, NA13OAR4310130]
  2. DOE [DE-SC004984]
  3. NERC [NE/K013548/1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multidecadal variability in the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) is shown to differ significantly between the 4 x CO2 and preindustrial control simulations of the GFDL Earth System Model, version 2M (ESM2M) general circulation model (GCM). In the preindustrial simulation, this model has a peak in the power spectrum of both AMOC and northward heat transport at latitudes between 26 degrees and 50 degrees N. In the 4 x CO2 simulation, the only significant spectral peak is near 60 degrees N. Understanding these differences is important for understanding the effect of future climate change on climate variability, as well as for providing insight into the physics underlying AMOC variability. Transfer function analysis demonstrates that the shift is predominantly due to a shift in the internal ocean dynamics rather than a change in stochastic atmospheric forcing. Specifically, the reduction in variance from 26 degrees to 45 degrees N is due to an increased stratification east of Newfoundland that results from the shallower and weaker mean overturning. The reduced AMOC variance that accompanies the reduced mean value of the AMOC at 4 x CO2 differs from predictions of simple box models that predict a weaker circulation to be closer to a stability bifurcation point and, therefore, be accompanied by amplified variability. The high-latitude variability in the 4 x CO2 simulation is related to the advection of anomalies by the subpolar gyre, distinct from the variability mechanism in the control simulation at lower latitudes. The 4 x CO2 variability has only a small effect on midlatitude meridional heat transport, but does significantly affect sea ice in the northern North Atlantic.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据