4.7 Article

The impacts of Chinese Nian culture on air pollution

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 112, 期 -, 页码 1740-1745

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.113

关键词

Air pollution; Nian culture; PM2.5; China

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41171133, 41001080, 41471135]
  2. National Social Science Foundation of China [09BSH024]
  3. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education and Institutions Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Air pollution in China has attracted world attention again since the winter of 2012. Besides considering the normal level of air pollution, it is interesting and important to choose and analyze periods of extremely high levels. These extremes are not only important because high values of PM2.5 have more severe impacts, but also to help us to effectively understand the causes of air pollution. Energy consumption, driven by the burning of fossil fuels, and motor vehicle emissions are regarded as two main primary causes of air pollution. However, culture is a less-obvious factor affecting air pollution, which is often overlooked by researchers. Culture plays an important role in many environmental problems. This study investigates why and how Nian culture leads to increased air pollution during Chinese New Year. Air pollution during Chinese Lunar New Year is more severe than other times of the year. Although the relationship between the lighting of fireworks and air pollution is of wide concern, the cultural factors behind it are not fully recognized, which hinders the understanding and solving of the problem. It is an important step for Chinese people to reduce the lighting of firecrackers, believed to drive away monsters. Four solutions are proposed to deal with the severe air pollution problem during Chinese New Year. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据