3.8 Article

Animal sentience

期刊

PHILOSOPHY COMPASS
卷 17, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/phc3.12822

关键词

-

资金

  1. H2020 European Research Council [851145]
  2. European Research Council (ERC) [851145] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article discusses the controversies surrounding sentience in fish and invertebrates and presents two ways of responding to the challenges. In a policy-making context, precautionary thinking can help in treating animals appropriately despite uncertainties about their sentience. In a scientific context, inspiration can be drawn from the science of human consciousness to distinguish between conscious and unconscious perception in animals.
'Sentience' sometimes refers to the capacity for any type of subjective experience, and sometimes to the capacity to have subjective experiences with a positive or negative valence, such as pain or pleasure. We review recent controversies regarding sentience in fish and invertebrates and consider the deep methodological challenge posed by these cases. We then present two ways of responding to the challenge. In a policy-making context, precautionary thinking can help us treat animals appropriately despite continuing uncertainty about their sentience. In a scientific context, we can draw inspiration from the science of human consciousness to disentangle conscious and unconscious perception (especially vision) in animals. Developing better ways to disentangle conscious and unconscious affect is a key priority for future research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据