4.7 Article

Quantifying direct and indirect carbon dioxide emissions of the Chinese tourism industry

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 126, 期 -, 页码 586-594

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.067

关键词

Tourism industry; Carbon emission; Input-output model; Tourism satellite account; China

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41301096]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Under the background of greenhouse gases emission reduction, the measurement of carbon emissions from the tourism industry has attracted increasing academic attention. Tourism is not a traditional sector in the System of National Accounts, and as a result the statistics of carbon dioxide emissions of the tourism industry on a national scale is difficult to calculate. The measurement methodology of a bottom up approach and a top-down approach were mainly used in others studies. Utilizing a boundary that includes domestic tourism consumption, inbound tourism consumption, and tourism consumption incurring domestically in relation to outbound travel and airfares paid to the national carriers, a top down approach is used to measure the national tourism dioxide emissions combining the Tourism Satellite Account and the Input Output model from productive industry. Using this case study, it was calculated that the total carbon emissions of the Chinese tourism industry in 2002, 2005, 2007 and 2010 were 111.49 Mt, 141.88 Mt, 169.76 Mt and 208.4 Mt respectively, accounting for 2.489%, 2.425%, 2.439% and 2.447% respectively of the total carbon emission of all industries in China. The indirect carbon emissions by other tourism sectors except the transport sector were 3-4 times their direct carbon emissions. Compared with the manufacturing industry, the tourism industry is an industry of low pollution and low energy consumption. We discuss-the advantage and shortcoming of the two approaches and put forward some suggestions to assist the research of tourism carbon emissions. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据