4.7 Article

A novel hybrid approach of activated carbon and ultrasound cavitation for the intensification of palm oil mill effluent (POME) polishing

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 112, 期 -, 页码 1218-1226

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.125

关键词

Palm oil mill effluent; POME; Activated carbon; Ultrasound; Cavitation; Treatment

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Grants 538 Scheme (FRGS) [FRGS/1/2013/539 SG05/UNIM/01/1]
  2. Ministry of Higher Education/Iraq
  3. Foundation of Technical Education/Iraq

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This investigation focuses on activated carbon (AC) adsorption and ultrasound (US) cavitation for polishing the palm oil mill effluent (POME). Both AC adsorption and US cavitation were investigated individually, in series and operating them in a combined way. The efficiency of above processes has been evaluated in terms of removal of chemical oxygen demand (COD) and total suspended solids (TSS). For the individual operation, the optimisation studies were carried out by using the following conditions: AC dosage (50-200 g/L); contact time (2, 4, 6 h); US power amplitude (50% and 80%) and US cavitation time (30-180 min). The optimisation studies utilising US power amplitude (50%) and cavitation time (15 min) followed by AC adsorption using minimum AC dosage (50 g/L) and contact time (30 min) resulted in similar to 100% COD and 83.33% TSS removals which meets the discharge limits set by the Department of Environment (DoE), Malaysia. The hybrid operation was also studied by simultaneously employing AC adsorption and US cavitation and it was observed that an adsorption dosage of 50 g/L resulted into achieving 73.08% COD and 98.33% TSS removals within 15 min of US irradiation. With the possibility of continuous and feasible sonochemical reactors, this hybrid approach of US cavitation followed by AC adsorption could be an alternative processing technique for POME polishing. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据