4.7 Article

Addressing the competitiveness effects of taxing carbon in China: domestic tax cuts versus border tax adjustments

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 112, 期 -, 页码 1568-1581

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.092

关键词

Carbon tax; Competitiveness; Border tax adjustments; General equilibrium

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71422011, 71001007]
  2. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-12-0039]
  3. National Science and Technology Support Program [2012BAC20B01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focuses on the international competitiveness effects of levying a carbon tax in China. Based on a computable general equilibrium model, this study analysed the impacts of a carbon tax on different sectors from the aspect of changes in market shares of domestic producers in the domestic markets and changes in exports. The effects of different measures, including domestic tax cuts and border tax adjustments, in alleviating the unfavourable competitiveness impacts were also analysed and compared, as were the impacts of different tax schemes on the macro-economy, sectoral profits and carbon emissions. The results show that without any complementary measures, a carbon tax would negatively shock the domestic market shares and exports of almost all tradable sectors and the profits of almost all sectors. As for cushioning the unfavourable effects, the domestic tax cuts are able to ease the negative impacts on the domestic market shares and exports of almost all tradable sectors. Moreover, the unfavourable impacts of domestic tax cuts on both the macro-economy and the sectoral profits are obviously smaller than those of the other schemes, regardless of the use of the same tax rate or emission reduction amount. Among the border tax adjustment measures, the best performance in general corresponds to the measure purely implementing adjustments on exports. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据