4.7 Article

Does food demand and rapid urbanization growth accelerate regional nitrogen inputs?

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 112, 期 -, 页码 1401-1409

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.046

关键词

Food production; Human activity; Huai River Basin; Net anthropogenic nitrogen input (NANI); Urbanization

资金

  1. Key Project of The Chinese Academy of Sciences [KZZD-EW-10-02]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology scientific project [SKLURE2013-1-05]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation [41171395]
  4. China Scholarship Council [201408110138]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Under the broad pressures of food demand and urbanization growth, an excess of reactive nitrogen has been generated, which has led to multiple human health and environmental concerns. Efforts to address these concerns require an accurate assessment of the roles of food demand and rapid growth in urbanization. The Huai River Basin (HRB) was chosen for our study area because it exemplifies a region facing the double pressures of rapid urban development and food demand, as seen in other developing countries. Chemical N fertilizer was the largest source of nitrogen in the HRB, accounting for about 68% of the total input, followed by atmospheric N deposition (19%), biological nitrogen fixation (7%) and net food & feed import (6%). During the period 1990-2010, average grain yield increased from 354.5 to 494.2 t km(-2) (a 39% increase), urbanization rate increased from 13% to 35% (a 22% increase), but the average growth rate of nitrogen input reached 63%. These results suggest that the driving force behind increasing nitrogen input may be attributable to food production, while rapid urban development did not accelerate the nitrogen input as expected. Instead, it will slow the increasing trend of nitrogen input. The accelerated trend in nitrogen inputs could be better managed by improving fertilizer efficiency, introducing cleaner energy sources, educating farmers for environmental awareness, and formulating economic development policies that explicitly consider the benefits of environmental protection. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据