3.8 Article

'La tradizione e come il mare': Giuseppe Pitre's Transnational Approach to Folk and Fairy Tales in the New Italy

期刊

ITALIAN STUDIES
卷 77, 期 3, 页码 271-283

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00751634.2022.2070368

关键词

Giuseppe Pitre; fiabe; fairy tales; Sicily; transnational; oral traditions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent translations of Giuseppe Pitre's work have brought attention back to the Sicilian folklorist, examining his comparative methodology and transnational approach to folk and fairy tales. Pitre's analysis of local history, women as storytellers, and connections to other regional traditions highlights his intervention against cultural stereotypes and resistance to cultural totalisations. Through his study of oral narratives, Pitre emphasizes the power of transnational connections to disrupt rigid national identity constructs.
Recent English and Italian translations of Giuseppe Pitre's Fiabe, novelle e racconti popolari have revived attention to the Sicilian folklorist. In Italy, collecting oral traditions emerged as a practice of regional cultural preservation during the political unification, modernisation, and redefinition of local identities within the new nation. This essay examines Pitre's introductory commentaries to his Fiabe in order to contextualise his comparative methodology and transnational approach to Sicilian folk and fairy tales. Pitre's 'Preface' and preliminary essay 'Of folk tales' offer insights into local history, women as storytellers, and Sicilian tales in relation to other regional traditions and transcultural folk repertoires. Mindful of Pitre's reinforcement of Sicilian stereotypes, this essay highlights his articulation of cultural difference as intervention and resistance to cultural totalisations. Pitre's simile of the sea-tradition best encapsulates his connections with transnational oral narratives and their power to cross national borders and disturb rigid national identity constructs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据