3.8 Article

Falling Through the Cracks: Graduate Students' Experiences of Mentoring Absence

出版社

SOC TEACHING & LEARNING HIGHER EDUCATION
DOI: 10.5206/cjsotlrcacea.2022.1.10957

关键词

focus groups; graduate; mentoring; qualitative; students

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is plenty of theoretical information available about how mentorship is supposed to work, its goals, and what makes it effective. However, there is a lack of empirical information about the processes and implications of mentoring when problems arise. Graduate students face significant challenges in areas such as psychology, physical well-being, finances, and relationships, and they expect mentorship to help alleviate these issues. Limited qualitative literature has described graduate students' perceptions and outcomes related to problems with mentorship.
Theory about how mentorship is supposed to work, its goals, and what makes it work is abundant. It is rarer to encounter empirical information about processes and implications when mentoring is a problem. Graduate students experience significant psychological, physical, financial, and relational challenges and likely have expectations about the ameliorating effects of mentorship. Limited qualitative literature has described graduate students' perceptions about problems with mentorship and students' outcomes. The descriptive qualitative study used secondary analysis to describe students' perceptions of problematic mentorship. Graduate student research assistants conducted 12 recorded focus group interviews and transcribed them. The authors used inductive content analysis to develop themes. Fifty-four participants were recruited, including masters' (n=19), PhD (n=34), and a graduate student not enrolled in a specific faculty (n=1). The students represented multiple disciplines. The major theme identified was falling through the cracks. The subthemes included missing mentorship, students' difficulties accessing mentorship, university structures undermining mentoring, and damage to mentees. Falling through the cracks highlights students' struggles with accessing mentorship, effects of missing mentorship, and students' solutions for modifying structural features that inhibit mentoring. Quantitative work could compare psychological outcomes associated with present and missing mentoring.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据