3.8 Review

Theoretical Principles and Perspectives of Hyperspectral Imaging Applied to Sediment Core Analysis

期刊

QUATERNARY
卷 5, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/quat5020028

关键词

hyperspectral imaging; core logging; chemometrics; image processing; spectroscopy; sediment core; paleoenvironment; data management

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hyperspectral imaging is an emerging technology that can be used to extract environmental properties of sediment cores. This article presents the applications of hyperspectral imaging in sediment core analysis and the current research progress in this field.
Hyperspectral imaging is a recent technology that has been gaining popularity in the geosciences since the 1990s, both in remote sensing and in the field or laboratory. Indeed, it allows the rapid acquisition of a large amount of data that are spatialized on the studied object with a low-cost, compact, and automatable sensor. This practical article aims to present the current state of knowledge on the use of hyperspectral imaging for sediment core analysis (core logging). To use the full potential of this type of sensor, many points must be considered and will be discussed to obtain reliable and quality data to extract many environmental properties of sediment cores. Hyperspectral imaging is used in many fields (e.g., remote sensing, geosciences and artificial intelligence) and offers many possibilities. The applications of the literature will be reviewed under five themes: lake and water body trophic status, source-to-sink approaches, organic matter and mineralogy studies, and sedimentary deposit characterization. Afterward, discussions will be focused on a multisensor core logger, data management, integrated use of these data for the selection of sample areas, and other opportunities. Through this practical article, we emphasize that hyperspectral imaging applied to sediment cores is still an emerging tool and shows many possibilities for refining the understanding of environmental processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据