4.5 Article

Determination of roxithromycin from human plasma samples based on magnetic surface molecularly imprinted polymers followed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectromer.

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2015.08.001

关键词

Magnetic molecularly imprinted polymers; Surface molecularly imprinted polymers; Roxithromycin; Human plasma; Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

资金

  1. National Natural Science Fund of China [51078108]
  2. Development Program of China (863 Program) [2011AA060905]
  3. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET11-0795]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a simple and reproducible method for the determination of roxithromycin in human plasma samples is proposed. The surface magnetic molecularly imprinted polymers (MMIPs) were utilized as sorbent. Roxithromycin was used as imprinted compound. The experimental results showed that the MMIPs had high affinity and selectivity toward roxithromycin. The extraction process was carried out in a single step by mixing the extraction solvent, MMIP5 and human plasma samples by vortex. When the extraction process was completed, the MMIPs adsorbed the analyte were separated from the sample matrix by an external magnet due to the magnetism. The analyte eluted from the MMIPs was analysed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Some main factors affecting the extraction of roxithromycin such as the amount of MMIPs, extraction solvent, extraction time, washing and elution conditions were optimized in this study. The calibration curve obtained by analyzing matrix-matched standards showed excellent linear relationship (r(2) = 0.9997) in the concentration range of 10-1000 ng mL(-1). The limit of detection and quantification obtained were 3.8 and 9.8 ng mL(-1), respectively. The relative standard deviations of intra- and inter-day obtained were in the range of 3.9 %-5.5 % and 2.9 %-4.6 % with the recoveries ranging from 86.5 % to 91.5 %. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据