4.5 Article

Separation and characterization of bufadienolides in toad skin using two-dimensional normal-phase liquid chromatography x reversed-phase liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2015.11.015

关键词

Bufadienolides; Normal-phase liquid chromatography; Two-dimensional liquid chromatography; MS/MS; Toad skin

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [21305138]
  2. External Cooperation Program of BIC, Chinese Academy of Science [121421KYSB20130013]
  3. Key Projects in the National Science & Technology Pillar Program in the twelfth Five-year Plan [2012BAI29B08]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bufadienolides possess various bioactivities especially antitumor. Due to the high structural diversity, the separation of bufadienolides often suffers from coelution problem on conventional RP columns. In this work, an off-line two-dimensional normal-phase liquid chromatography x reversed-phase liquid chromatography (2D-NPLC x RPLC) method was developed to separate and characterize bufadienolides in toad skin. Several RP and NP columns were evaluated with five reference bufadienlides. The XUnion C18 and XAmide columns exhibited superior chromatographic performances for bufadienlide separation, and were selected in RPLC and NPLC, respectively. RPLC was used in the second-dimension for the good compatibility with MS, while NPLC was adopted in the first-dimension. The orthogonality of the 2D-NPLC x RPLC system was investigated by the geometric approach using fifteen bufadienolide mixtures. The result was 49.6%, demonstrating reasonable orthogonality of this 2D-LC system. By combining the 2D-LC system with MS, 64 bufadienlides including 33 minor ones and 11 pairs of isomers in toad skin were identified. This off-line 2D-NPLC x RPLC allowed to solve the coelution problem of bufadienlides in one-dimension RPLC, and thus facilitated the identification significantly. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据