4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Ultra-fast high-efficiency enantioseparations by means of a teicoplanin-based chiral stationary phase made on sub-2 μm totally porous silica particles of narrow size distribution

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1427, 期 -, 页码 55-68

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2015.11.071

关键词

1.9 mu m Titan particles; High efficiency and ultra-fast chiral separations; Short/ultra short columns; UHPC-Titan120-T-ZWIT-1.9; UHPC-chiral separations

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new ultra-high performance teicoplanin-based stationary phase was prepared starting from sub-2 mu m totally porous silica particles of narrow size distribution. Columns of different lengths were packed at high pressure and a deep and systematic evaluation of kinetic performance, in terms of van Deemter analysis, was performed under different elution conditions (HILIC, POM, RP and NP) by using both achiral and chiral probes. For the achiral probes, the efficiency of the columns at the minimum of the van Deemter curves were very high leading to some 278 000, 270 000, 262 000 and 232 000 plates/m in hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC), polar organic mode (POM), normal phase (NP) and reversed phase (RP) respectively. The lowest plate height, H-min = 3.59 mu m (h(/) = 1.89), was obtained under HILIC conditions at a flow rate of 1.4 mL/min. Efficiency as high as 200 000-250 000 plates/m (at the optimum flow rate) was obtained in the separation of the enantiomers of chiral probes under HILIC/POM conditions. N-protected amino acids, alpha-aryloxy acids, herbicides, anti-inflammatory agents were baseline separated on short (2-cm) and ultra-short (1-cm) columns, with analysis time in the order of 1 min. The enantiomers of N-BOC-D,L-methionine were successfully baseline separated in only 11 s in HILIC mode. Several examples of fast and efficient resolutions in sub/supercritical fluid chromatography were also obtained for a range of chiral carboxylic acids. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据