3.9 Review

Multiaxial fatigue under variable amplitude loadings: review and solutions

期刊

出版社

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/IJSI-03-2022-0025

关键词

Random; variable amplitude fatigue; Multiaxial fatigue; Critical plane; Life evaluation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11972110]
  2. Sichuan Science and Technology Program [2022JDJQ0024]
  3. Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation [2021B1515140030]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to effectively evaluate the multiaxial random/variable amplitude fatigue life. Recent studies on the critical plane method under multiaxial random/variable amplitude loading are reviewed and the computational framework is clearly presented in this paper.
Purpose Engineering components/structures with geometric discontinuities normally bear complex and variable loads, which lead to a multiaxial and random/variable amplitude stress/strain state. Hence, this study aims how to effectively evaluate the multiaxial random/variable amplitude fatigue life. Design/methodology/approach Recent studies on critical plane method under multiaxial random/variable amplitude loading are reviewed, and the computational framework is clearly presented in this paper. Findings Some basic concepts and latest achievements in multiaxial random/variable amplitude fatigue analysis are introduced. This review summarizes the research status of four main aspects of multiaxial fatigue under random/variable amplitude loadings, namely multiaxial fatigue criterion, method for critical plane determination, cycle counting method and damage accumulation criterion. Particularly, the latest achievements of multiaxial random/variable amplitude fatigue using critical plane methods are classified and highlighted. Originality/value This review attempts to provide references for further research on multiaxial random/variable amplitude fatigue and to promote the development of multiaxial fatigue from experimental research to practical engineering application.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据