4.6 Article

A rapid and simple pretreatment method for benzoylurea insecticides in honey samples using in-syringe dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction based on the direct solidification of ionic liquids

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1471, 期 -, 页码 60-67

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2016.10.027

关键词

Benzoylurea insecticides; Honey; Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction; Direct solidification; Ionic liquids

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21377163, 21507159]
  2. Chinese Universities Scientific Fund [2016QC082]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A pretreatment method using in-syringe dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction based on the direct solidification of ionic liquids before high performance liquid chromatography analysis was developed for the determination of benzoylurea insecticides (BUs) in honey samples. The hydrophobic ionic liquid [N-4444][PF6], formed in situ by the hydrophilic ionic liquid [N-4444]Cl and the ion exchange reagent KPF6, was used to extract the target analytes. The entire extraction procedure was performed in a syringe. The extractant was solidified at room temperature and collected using a nylon membrane filter. This technique did not require a dispersive solvent, vortex mixer, ultrasound bath, or centrifugation. The parameters affecting the extraction efficiency were investigated through an experimental design. Under the optimal conditions, the limits of detection for the four BUs varied from 0.21 to 0.42 mu gL(-1) in solution (2.1-4.2 mu g kg(-1) in honey). Good linearities were obtained in the range of 2-300 mu gL(-1), with coefficients of determination greater than 0.999. The recoveries of the four BUs ranged from 80.94% to 84.59%. The intra-day (n=3) and inter-day (n=3) relative standard deviations were less than 5.08%. Finally, the proposed method was applied to the determination of BUs in commercial honey samples with satisfactory results. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据