4.6 Article

A chemical profiling solution for Chinese medicine formulas using comprehensive and loop-based multiple heart-cutting two-dimensional liquid chromatography coupled with quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1438, 期 -, 页码 198-204

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2016.02.034

关键词

2DLC/qTOE-MS; Comprehensive 2DLC; Multiple heart-cutting 2DLC; Chinese medicine formula; Gegen-Qinlian Decoction

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81222054, 81470172]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chinese medicine formulas represent an excellent illustration for complex matrix. The complexity lies in a big array of small molecules with high chemical diversity. The present paper describes a novel chemical profiling solution for complex matrix by combining comprehensive and multiple heart-cutting two-dimensional liquid chromatography coupled with quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (2DLC/qTOE-MS). This solution includes method optimization, combinational separation, and structural characterization. It was exemplified by fully profiling the chemical constituents of a four-herb traditional Chinese medicine formula, Gegen-Qinlian Decoction (GQD). GQD was separated by a RP x RP (C-18 x Phenyl-Hexyl) 2DLC system, and eluted with acidic x alkaline mobile phases with an optimized shift gradient elution program. In the comprehensive 2DLC mode, 280 peaks were detected, and 125 compounds were characterized within 42 minutes. The multiple heart-cutting (MHC) mode extended the D-2 modulation time to 3.0 min to effectively separate the minor compounds. The D-1 eluate within 4.4 min was loaded into eleven 40-mu L loops. These fractions were successively separated by 2D to resolve 13 additional compounds. The combination of comprehensive and MHC 2DLC/qTOE-MS provides a powerful technique for global chemical profiling of Chinese medicine formulas and other complex systems. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据