4.6 Article

Comprehensive untargeted lipidomic analysis using core-shell C30 particle column and high field orbitrap mass spectrometer

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1440, 期 -, 页码 123-134

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2016.02.054

关键词

Lipidomics; Reverse-phase liquid chromatography; Accucore C30 column; Q Exactive HF; Mass spectrometry; Untargeted analysis; LipidSearch

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [GM104678]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The goal of untargeted lipidomics is to have high throughput, yet comprehensive and unambiguous identification and quantification of lipids. Novel stationary phases in LC separation and new mass spectrometric instruments capable of high mass resolving power and faster scanning rate are essential to achieving this goal. In this work, 4 reversed phase LC columns coupled with a high field quadrupole orbitrap mass spectrometer (QExactive HF) were thoroughly compared using complex lipid standard mixture and rat plasma and liver samples. A good separation of all lipids was achieved in 24 min of gradient. The columns compared include C30 and C18 functionalization on either core shell or totally porous silica particles, with size ranging from 1.7 to 2.6 mu m. Accucore C30 column showed the narrowest peaks and highest theoretical plate number, and excellent peak capacity and retention time reproducibility (<1% standard deviation). As a result, it resulted in 430 lipid species identified from rat plasma and rat liver samples with highest confidence. The high resolution offered by the up-front RPLC allowed discrimination of cis/trans isomeric lipid species, and the high field orbitrap mass spectrometer afforded the clear distinction of isobaric lipid species in full scan MS and the unambiguous assignment of sn-positional isomers for lysophospholipids in MS/MS. Taken together, the high efficiency LC separation and high mass resolving MS analysis are very promising tools for untargeted lipidomics analysis. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据