3.8 Review

Deep learning models in medical image analysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORAL BIOSCIENCES
卷 64, 期 3, 页码 312-320

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.job.2022.03.003

关键词

Medical image analysis; Computer -aided diagnosis; Computer vision; Deep learning; Arti ficial intelligence

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Deep learning is a powerful technology for medical image analysis that offers fast and robust object detection, segmentation, tracking, and classification of pathophysiological anatomical structures. However, the lack of sufficient medical images for training sets poses a major limitation for deep learning in medical image analysis.
Background: Deep learning is a state-of-the-art technology that has rapidly become the method of choice for medical image analysis. Its fast and robust object detection, segmentation, tracking, and classification of pathophysiological anatomical structures can support medical practitioners during routine clinical workflow. Thus, deep learning-based applications for diseases diagnosis will empower physicians and allow fast decision-making in clinical practice. Highlight: Deep learning can be more robust with various features for differentiating classes, provided the training set is large and diverse for analysis. However, sufficient medical images for training sets are not always available from medical institutions, which is one of the major limitations of deep learning in medical image analysis. This review article presents some solutions for this issue and discusses efforts needed to develop robust deep learning-based computer-aided diagnosis applications for better clinical workflow in endoscopy, radiology, pathology, and dentistry. Conclusion: The introduction of deep learning-based applications will enhance the traditional role of medical practitioners in ensuring accurate diagnoses and treatment in terms of precision, reproducibility, and scalability. (c) 2022 Japanese Association for Oral Biology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据