4.2 Article

Simultaneous Determination of β-Cypermethrin and Its Metabolite 3-Phenoxybenzoic Acid in Microbial Degradation Systems by HPLC-UV

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHIC SCIENCE
卷 54, 期 9, 页码 1584-1591

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/chromsci/bmw108

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31371775]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The wide use of pesticides in agriculture is necessary to guarantee adequate food production worldwide. However, pesticide residues have caused global concern because of their potential health risk to consumers. In this study, we could identify beta-cypermethrin (beta-CY) and its degradation product 3-phenoxybenzoic acid (3-PBA) by liquid chromatograph-mass spectrometry. Few studies on the simultaneous determination of beta-CY and its metabolites have been carried out so far; hence, we established a high-performance liquid chromatography method to determine the concentrations of both beta-CY and 3-PBA simultaneously in microbial degradation systems. In this study, a novel beta-CY degrading strain, Bacillus licheniformis B-1, was isolated from a tea garden soil, utilizing beta-CY as a growth substrate. Good linear relationships between beta-CY and 3-PBA were observed and the concentrations of reference solutions were between 0.50 and 60.00 mu g/mL. Satisfactory stability and intra-and interday precision were obtained. The limits of detection were 0.06 and 0.13 mu g/mL for beta-CY and 3-PBA, respectively, and the corresponding limits of quantification were 0.21 and 0.34 mu g/mL, respectively. Spiking recoveries for beta-CY varied from 98.38 to 105.80%, with relative standard deviations (RSDs) varying from 1.49 to 3.93%. Spiking recoveries for 3-PBA varied from 99.59 to 101.20%, with RSDs varying from 0.58 to 3.64%. The proposed method has advantages of simplicity, rapidity, high accuracy, good separation and reproducibility; thus, it is ideally suitable for simultaneous determination of beta-CY and 3-PBA in microbial degradation systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据