3.8 Article Proceedings Paper

Shared decision-making in Malaysia: Legislation, patient involvement, implementation and the impact of COVID-19

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.04.020

关键词

Malaysia; Multicultural; Shared decision-making; Patient decision aids; Implementation; Patient and public involvement

资金

  1. University of Malaya Research University Grant- Faculty Program [GPF006C-2018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The practice of Shared Decision Making (SDM) in Malaysia started in 2010 to meet the increasing needs of patients with chronic diseases. It emphasizes patient-centered care and has been applied in medical professionalism guidelines and legal judgments on informed consent. Research on SDM in Malaysia includes patient and public involvement, incorporation of local cultural values, and implementation in the healthcare system and organizational culture.
Shared decision making (SDM) activities in Malaysia began around 2010. The rise in the numbers of patients with chronic disease in Malaysia underscores a growing need for doctors to practice patient -centred care and SDM as more Malaysians come into regular contact with health decision-making scena-rios. Recent guidelines for medical professionalism have emphasized that options and risks be discussed in consultations, especially for procedures with risk of adverse outcomes. Although SDM is not legally required, principles of SDM are applied in legal judgements on informed consent. Research on SDM has grown to include the adoption of patient and public involvement in research, an increased emphasis on incorporating local cultural values in SDM, and implementation of SDM in Malaysia's health system and organizational culture. While COVID-19 hindered the progress of SDM research, one positive development was that vaccination choices heightened public consciousness about personal decisional autonomy and the need to discuss pros and cons with doctors before making a medical decision.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据