3.8 Article

INFLUENCE OF UNRIPE BANANA FLOUR INCORPORATION ON THE PHYSICAL, ANTIOXIDANT PROPERTIES AND CONSUMER ACCEPTABILITY OF BISCUITS

出版社

SLOVAK UNIV AGRICULTURE NITRA
DOI: 10.55251/jmbfs.2632

关键词

Polyphenolic compounds; Flour; Biscuits; Sensory evaluation; Functional properties

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the influence of incorporating unripe banana flour (UBF) in biscuits, finding that biscuits with 10% UBF were more acceptable in terms of taste, crispness, and overall acceptability. Results suggest that UBF can be utilized as a functional ingredient in bakery products such as biscuits.
The purpose of this work was to evaluate the influence of incorporating unripe banana flour (UBF) in biscuit in order to determine its physical, antioxidant and sensory properties. Two unripe non-commercial banana cultivars (Luvhele and Mabonde) were used. Wheat flour was replaced by 10, 15, 20 and 30% of UBF. Functional properties of UBF, physical properties, polyphenolic compounds, antioxidant activity and consumer acceptability of baked biscuits were determined. Functional properties of UBF revealed decrease in water and oil absorption capacity, foaming capacity and increase in bulk density at p < 0.05. Weight, thickness, fracturability and hardness of composite biscuits significantly increased at p < 0.05. The diameter and spread ratio decreased with the inclusion of UBF. The colour of the biscuits (L*, b* and hue values) also decreased. However, the addition of UBF increased the a* value, colour differences and total phenolic content of biscuits. The total flavonoid content of Luvhele biscuits increased while that of Mabonde biscuits decreased. The antioxidant properties of biscuits were enhanced with UBF addition. Consumer acceptability results revealed that biscuits with 10% UBF level were more acceptable by panellists with regards to taste, crispness and overall acceptability. Results show that UBF can be utilised as functional ingredient in bakery products such as biscuits.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据