4.0 Article

Examining incel subculture on reddit

期刊

JOURNAL OF CRIME & JUSTICE
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/0735648X.2022.2074867

关键词

Incel; online; subculture; misogyny; qualitative

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The online presence of incels, individuals who identify as involuntary celibates, has become a growing concern for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers. This study examines the incel movement and their online communities by analyzing comments from the now-defunct subreddit r/Incels. The study focuses on identifying widely supported subcultural discourse and understanding how incels utilize online spaces to reinforce deviant behavior. The findings highlight the importance and challenges of using online sources to gain knowledge about deviant communities and behaviors.
The online presence of incels, or involuntary celibates, has been an increasing security concern for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers in recent years, given that self-identified incels - including Alek Minassian and Elliot Rodger - used the Internet to disseminate incel ideology and manifestos prior to committing acts of violence. However, little is empirically known about the incel movement in general or their online communities in particular. The present study draws from a set of comments from r/Incels, a now defunct but once popular subreddit dedicated to the incel community, and compares the most highly-upvoted comments (n = 500) to a random set of other comments (n = 500) in the subreddit. This qualitative analysis focuses on identifying subcultural discourse that is widely supported and engaged with by members of the online community and the extent to which incels utilize this online space to reaffirm deviant behavior. Our study underscores the importance, as well as the difficulties, of drawing from online sources like web-forums to generate new knowledge on deviant communities and behaviors. We conclude with a discussion of the implications of this analysis, its limitations, and avenues for future research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据