3.8 Article

Hyper-Eosinophilic Syndrome with Myocarditis after Inactivated SARSCoV-2 Vaccination-A Case Study

期刊

CURRENT DRUG SAFETY
卷 18, 期 1, 页码 103-106

出版社

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL
DOI: 10.2174/1574886317666220509165317

关键词

Adverse drug reaction; covaxin; COVID-19 vaccine; dermatological; eosinophilia; myocarditis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A young man presented with periorbital swelling, finger swelling, tachycardia, and breathlessness after receiving the COVAXIN vaccine. He was found to have elevated blood eosinophils and myocarditis. Treatment with steroids and supportive care resulted in successful recovery. This is the first reported case of hyper-eosinophilia syndrome after COVAXIN administration, and vigilance is necessary for such adverse events.
Introduction COVID-19 vaccine-induced serious adverse reactions are rare. Hyper-eosinophilia syndrome with myocarditis has not been reported earlier following BBV152 vaccine administration. Case Presentation A young man without any co-morbidities presented with persistent periorbital swelling along with itchy swelling over fingers, resting tachycardia, and exertional breathlessness following the first dose of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (BBV152, COVAXIN). On investigation, the patient had elevated blood eosinophils (maximum 21.5% with an absolute eosinophil count of 2767/mm(3)) and myocarditis (Lake Louise Criteria). He was successfully treated with steroids and supportive treatment. Conclusion This is the first reported case of hyper-eosinophilia syndrome after COVAXIN administration. Prior history of the allergic disease may be a predisposing factor in this case. Hyper-eosinophilia can present with variable symptoms. In the current case, myocarditis was present with persistent resting tachycardia and dyspnea. Steroid and antiallergic drugs may be successful for the treatment of vaccine-induced hyper-eosinophilia with myocarditis. Increased vigilance is needed for such adverse events.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据