4.0 Article

Optimizing the Beam Selection for Noncoplanar VMAT by Using Simulated Annealing Approach

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TRPMS.2021.3111736

关键词

Beam selection; noncoplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT); radiotherapy; simulated annealing (SA); treatment planning optimization

资金

  1. French Brittany Region
  2. French ANR within the Investissements d'Avenir Program (Labex CAMI) [ANR-11-LABX-0004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to optimize beam selection in noncoplanar VMAT using simulated annealing method, leading to better organ avoidance. The proposed method was compared to standard approaches and showed better organ protection in specific patient cases.
Noncoplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment can achieve better organ-at-risk (OAR) avoidance by orienting the radiation beams in a different geometric plane relative to the patient. However, determining the optimal set of beam orientations is challenging due to the additional degrees of freedom. The objective of this study was to use simulated annealing (SA) for beam selection in a noncoplanar VMAT optimization context. The SA method was combined with a direct leaf trajectory optimization approach to obtain a set of globally optimal beams which serve as control points for the treatment trajectory. The proposed method was evaluated through the TG119 benchmark and two clinical cases (prostate and liver cancers). Finally, the SA beam selection method was compared to the standard coplanar and noncoplanar beam selection approaches. The results showed an accurate delivery of the prescription dose to the target tumor volume in all cases. Generally, not on every organ, the noncoplanar SA method showed better OAR sparing compared to the coplanar and noncoplanar greedy method. This work demonstrates that optimized noncoplanar beam orientations using the proposed SA method can be more clinically interesting than the coplanar method in some specific patient cases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据