3.8 Article

FOREIGN EMPLOYMENT IN ENTERPRISES - EXAMPLES FROM COUNTRIES WITH DIFFERENT CULTURES

期刊

出版社

ENTERPRENEURSHIP & SUSTAINABILITY CENTER
DOI: 10.9770/jesi.2022.9.3(17)

关键词

migration; employment migration; foreign employment; comparative analysis

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research conducted a comparative analysis of foreign employment in companies operating in the UK, Poland, and UAE. The findings showed a similar trend in the increase of foreign employees in these three countries. The largest age group of foreign employees was 25-35 years, and the most common type of contract was fixed-term full-time employment. Manual labor jobs were the most common among foreigners.
Migration has been a topic discussed across international boundaries especially the mobility of international workers. The purpose of this research was to conduct a comparative analysis of foreign employment in enterprises and firms operating in UK, Poland and UAE. The study was driven by the increasing rate of migration whether to look for better employment and life opportunities or simply a change of scenery abroad. The analysis was conducted using primary data collected from managers of the companies operating in these countries. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and comparative analysis technique of chi-square tests for independence. The findings indicated that there was a significant relationship between the country in which the companies operated and the age of foreign employees, type of contract, a common type of jobs foreigners are employed, and the reason why the company decided to employ foreigners. The study concluded that there is a similar trend in the increase in the number of foreign employees working in the three countries - the UK, Poland and UAE. The largest age group of foreign employees was 25-35 years. The highest type of contract was fixed-term full-time employment consented by 165 companies. The most common job was unskilled manual labour.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据