3.9 Article

How to cheat on your final paper: Assigning AI for student writing

期刊

AI & SOCIETY
卷 38, 期 4, 页码 1395-1405

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00146-022-01397-z

关键词

Language models; Plagiarism; AI literacy; Writing; Pedagogy; Ethics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper shares the results of an educational experiment where undergraduates were assigned to cheat on their final class essay using text-generating AI software. It explores the ethical issues of using AI in writing, plagiarism, conditions for AI assistance, and how working with AI could change the way we approach writing, authenticity, and creativity. The experiment allowed students to gain a broader perspective on the ethics and practice of writing with AI.
This paper shares results from a pedagogical experiment that assigns undergraduates to cheat on a final class essay by requiring their use of text-generating AI software. For this assignment, students harvested content from an installation of GPT-2, then wove that content into their final essay. At the end, students offered a revealed version of the essay as well as their own reflections on the experiment. In this assignment, students were specifically asked to confront the oncoming availability of AI as a writing tool. What are the ethics of using AI this way? What counts as plagiarism? What are the conditions, if any, we should place on AI assistance for student writing? And how might working with AI change the way we think about writing, authenticity, and creativity? While students (and sometimes GPT-2) offered thoughtful reflections on these initial questions, actually composing with GPT-2 opened their perspectives more broadly on the ethics and practice of writing with AI. In this paper, I share how students experienced those issues, connect their insights to broader conversations in the humanities about writing and communication, and explain their relevance for the ethical use and evaluation of language models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据