4.3 Article

Equity, justice and the SDGs: lessons learnt from two decades of INEA scholarship

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10784-022-09563-w

关键词

Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs); Equity; Justice; Access; Allocation; International Environmental Agreements

资金

  1. European Research Council Grant on Climate Change and Fossil Fuel [101020082]
  2. European Research Council (ERC) [101020082] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article reviews the coverage of environmental justice issues in this journal over the past two decades, explores different theoretical and empirical approaches to justice, and provides recommendations for the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
Environmental justice issues have been incrementally but consistently covered within this journal in the last two decades. This article reviews theoretical and empirical approaches to justice in INEA scholarship in order to identify trends and draw lessons for the interpretation and implementation of the 2030 Agenda and for living within environmental limits. Our review traces how justice considerations were initially covered within new institutionalist scholarship on collective action and social practices, to conceptualizing justice as 'access and allocation', to newer notions of planetary justice. We link these trends to scholarship on diverse epistemologies and typologies of justice, including conservative, corrective, distributive and procedural justice, and examine their operationalization within the empirical domains of climate, water and sustainable development. In concluding, we draw out implications for the 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda. We argue that a just approach is essential to living within environmental limits, with greater synergies needed between collective action and social practice approaches. While justice can be unpacked for practical and political reasons into access and allocation, we find that (procedural) access considerations are more politically palatable in practice than a concern with allocation (distributive justice), which remains much more contested. As such, dominant approaches promote 'conservative' or thin market-based notions of justice. We conclude by noting that just allocation is a precondition to just access. A failure to prioritize and achieve more corrective and distributive forms of justice will, without doubt, contribute to exacerbating global ecological degradation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据