4.5 Article

Conversion of rice husks to polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) via a three-step process: optimized alkaline pretreatment, enzymatic hydrolysis, and biosynthesis by Burkholderia cepacia USM (JCM 15050)

期刊

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.4993

关键词

rice husks; alkali pretreatment; Burkholderia cepacia; polyhydroxyalkanoate

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council [348-2012-6169]
  2. Malaysian Ministry of Higher Education

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Rice husks (RH) are agricultural residues with abundant storage of cellulose and hemicellulose, making them a potential feedstock for polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) production. In this study, optimization of pretreatment with alkali under various conditions was performed before enzymatic hydrolysis using Celluclast 1.5 L (EC 3.2.1.4) and Novozyme 188 (EC 3.2.1.21). The hydrolysate was fed to two strains, Burkholderia cepacia USM (KM 15050) and Cupriavidus necator NSDG-GG, an engineered strain of Cupriavidus necator H16, to evaluate their PHA production. RESULTS: Pretreatment of RH using 1.0 mol L-1 potassium hydroxide (KOH) at high temperature and pressure (HTP) (121 C, 0.1 MPa) gave maximum sugar yield of up to 87% (per total carbohydrate content) after optimized enzymatic hydrolysis, whereby the undiluted hydrolysate contained approximately 20 g L-1 total reducing sugars (TRS). B. cepacia USM utilized the hydrolysate more efficiently compared with C. necator NSDG-GG, with a maximum cell dry weight (CDW) of 4.9g L-1 and 40 wt% PHA at shake-flask scale. The CDW and PHA content of B. cepacia USM cultivated in a 5 L fermentor were 7.8 g L-1 and 50%, respectively. The decrease in total phenolics at the end of fermentation suggested that 8. cepacia USM was able to metabolize phenolic compounds. CONCLUSION: Through optimized alkali pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis, RH has the potential to be converted to PHA by B. cepacia USM, thus valorizing this agricultural by-product. (C) 2016 Society of Chemical Industry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据