4.2 Article

Friendship Conflict, Drinking to Cope, and Alcohol-Related Problems: A Longitudinal Actor-Partner Interdependence Model

期刊

EMERGING ADULTHOOD
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 595-608

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/21676968211060945

关键词

alcohol use/abuse; coping; friendship; transitions to adulthood; peers

资金

  1. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council Award [435-2015-1798]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that friendship conflict was mediated by coping-with-depression motives in influencing emerging adults' alcohol-related problems, and coping-with-anxiety motives also played a mediating role at the within-subjects level. Interventions for emerging adults' problem drinking should take into account the influence of friendship conflict on their tendencies to drink to cope with depression and anxiety.
Drinking to cope with negative affect is a strong predictor of alcohol-related problems. We hypothesized that the association between friendship conflict and alcohol-related problems would be mediated by coping-with-depression motives in emerging adults' close friendships. We used a 4-wave, 4-month longitudinal self-report survey design measuring friendship conflict, coping motives, and alcohol-related problems from 174 same-sex friendship dyads. Participants were recruited from Nova Scotia, Canada between September 2016 and February 2019. Participants had a mean age of 18.66 (SD = 1.17) and were 66.1% female. Data were analyzed using multilevel structural equation modeling. Coping-with-depression motives mediated the link between conflict and alcohol-related problems at the between- and within-subject levels. Unexpectedly, coping-with-anxiety motives was an additional mediator at the within-subjects level. Interventions for emerging adults' problem drinking should consider the influence of friendship conflict and its impact on emerging adults' tendencies to drink to cope with both depression and anxiety. Materials/Syntax: https://osf.io/krs3v/

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据