3.8 Article

Remote working: unprecedented increase and a developing research agenda

期刊

HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL
卷 25, 期 2, 页码 105-113

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13678868.2022.2049108

关键词

remote work; COVID-19; flexible working; hybrid working

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As we adapt to COVID-19, remote working is expected to become a long-term change in work practices. The growth of hybrid working seems inevitable. This has implications for various HRD topics, including learning and development, productivity, workload, communication, and people management. This special edition of research investigates the relationships between remote and hybrid working and employee wellbeing, work-life balance, leader-member exchange, knowledge exchange, workforce inclusion, learning effectiveness, sustainable career development, and employee voice and choice in work practices.
As we start to move beyond or acclimatise to COVID-19, a rise in remote working looks set to be the change in work practices most likely to stick long term. Specifically, a long-term growth in hybrid working seems inevitable. Pre-pandemic, work technology had already advanced considerably to enable remote working, but the lockdowns demonstrated that it is eminently feasible in many more jobs than previously thought and the demand from employees appears to have strengthened substantially. As a fundamental shift in how we work, there are implications for core HRD topics, including learning and development, organisational productivity, workload, effective communications and relationships, and people management capability. This special edition contributes to an important growing research agenda on remote and hybrid working, investigating its relationships with employee wellbeing and work-life balance; leader-member exchange (LMX); knowledge exchange; workforce inclusion; learning effectiveness; sustainable career development; and employee voice and choice in informing work practices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据