4.7 Article

Nucleation barrier reconstruction via the seeding method in a lattice model with competing nucleation pathways

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 145, 期 21, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4962216

关键词

-

资金

  1. EPSRC [EP/E501311/1, EP/H00341X/1, EP/K000128/1]
  2. EPSRC [EP/K000233/1, EP/K000128/1, EP/H00341X/1, EP/G054940/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [1091213, EP/G054940/1, EP/K000233/1, EP/H00341X/1, EP/K000128/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We study a three-species analogue of the Potts lattice gas model of nucleation from solution in a regime where partially disordered solute is a viable thermodynamic phase. Using a multicanonical sampling protocol, we compute phase diagrams for the system, from which we determine a parameter regime where the partially disordered phase is metastable almost everywhere in the temperature-fugacity plane. The resulting model shows non-trivial nucleation and growth behaviour, which we examine via multidimensional free energy calculations. We consider the applicability of the model in capturing the multi-stage nucleation mechanisms of polymorphic biominerals (e.g., CaCO3). We then quantitatively explore the kinetics of nucleation in our model using the increasingly popular seeding method. We compare the resulting free energy barrier heights to those obtained via explicit free energy calculations over a wide range of temperatures and fugacities, carefully considering the propagation of statistical error. We find that the ability of the seeding method to reproduce accurate free energy barriers is dependent on the degree of supersaturation, and severely limited by the use of a nucleation driving force Delta mu computed for bulk phases. We discuss possible reasons for this in terms of underlying kinetic assumptions, and those of classical nucleation theory. (C) 2016 Author(s). All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据