4.2 Article

The relationships between university students' information-seeking strategies, social-media specific epistemological beliefs, information literacy, and personality traits

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2022.101155

关键词

Social media-specific epistemological beliefs; Online information searching strategy; Information literacy; Personality; Psychometric properties

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The reliability of information in social media and the epistemological beliefs of individuals who use these media are important factors that affect information-seeking strategies. A structural model was constructed to explore these factors, and it was found that epistemological beliefs specific to social media are related to information-seeking strategies. Personality traits and information literacy also play a role in this relationship, with conscientiousness having the greatest impact on online information-seeking strategies.
Due to doubts about the reliability of information in social media environments, and the epistemological beliefs of individuals who use these media, questioning the source of information and the perception of knowledge structure, is an important research topic. A structural model was constructed to explore structures associated with epistemological beliefs (justification for knowing) and online information-seeking strategies. The model included personality traits and information literacy. Data were collected from 190 university students. PLS-SEM was implemented in the analysis of the data. Analysis revealed that there was a significant relationship between epistemological beliefs specific to social media and information-seeking strategies, and information literacy structure has a direct effect on information-seeking strategies. Agreeableness and neuroticism were related with several dimensions of social media-specific beliefs. It was found that the personality trait which has the greatest effect on online information-seeking strategies is conscientiousness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据