4.2 Article

It's more about building trust: Physical education teachers' experiences with trauma-informed practices

期刊

EUROPEAN PHYSICAL EDUCATION REVIEW
卷 28, 期 4, 页码 906-922

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1356336X221096603

关键词

Trauma; trauma-informed practices; physical education; pedagogy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores the experiences and knowledge of 27 physical education teachers in the United States regarding trauma and trauma-informed practices. The findings reveal that teachers utilize four dimensions related to trauma-informed strategies. Despite lacking educational experience and professional training, the teachers demonstrate potential in working with students who have experienced trauma.
In schools today, student trauma and toxic stress may impact students' ability to learn. Therefore, this inquiry explored the experiences and knowledge of 27 physical education (PE) teachers in the United States related to trauma and trauma-informed practices. Teachers' experiences were examined through semi-structured interviews informed by the literature. Employing interpretivist philosophical assumptions, data analysis revealed that teachers utilized four general dimensions related to trauma-informed strategies in their gymnasiums: creating a physically safe and emotionally safe space, formulating positive and healthy relationships with students, developing student responsibility, and guiding students toward self-regulation. These strategies aligned with Souers and Hall's (2019) tenets of fostering resilient learners. Although the teachers did not have prior educational experiences with trauma and trauma-informed practices and minimal professional development, they demonstrated what is possible when working with students who experience trauma and/or toxic stress. By fostering resilient learners and engaging in trauma-informed practices, it is conceivable for P-12 students to have positive and inclusive experiences in PE.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据