4.2 Article

Did students learn less during the COVID-19 pandemic? Reading and mathematics competencies before and after the first pandemic wave

期刊

SCHOOL EFFECTIVENESS AND SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT
卷 33, 期 4, 页码 544-563

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09243453.2022.2061014

关键词

COVID-19; school closures; mathematics competencies; reading competencies; large-scale assessments

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted classes in spring 2020 and led to a significant learning loss for students, particularly those with lower achievement. Remote learning environments presented challenges for teachers, and students had less time for learning. A study on fifth graders in Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany revealed slightly lower competence scores in 2020 compared to previous years, especially in reading and mathematics. Low-achieving students in mathematics seem to have a learning backlog that requires attention in future education.
The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted classes in spring 2020. Temporary school closures supposedly led to a considerable learning loss, particularly for low-achieving students. Teachers faced challenges of remote learning environments. Students spent less time learning. The present study investigates the competencies of fifth graders in Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany, using large-scale assessments in reading and mathematics from annual mandatory tests in September (each n > 80,000). Competence scores were slightly lower in 2020 (after 2 months of school closures) compared with the three previous years (-0.07 SD for reading comprehension, -0.09 for operations, and -0.03 for numbers). Regarding mathematics, low-achieving students seem to have a learning backlog that deserves attention in future education. School characteristics such as the average sociocultural capital and the proportion of students with a migration background played a minor role in mediating the schools' learning loss. Still, lower sociocultural capital was positively associated with larger learning loss in mathematics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据