4.7 Article

The behavior of active diffusiophoretic suspensions: An accelerated Laplacian dynamics study

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 145, 期 13, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4963722

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF [CBET-1437570]
  2. Directorate For Engineering
  3. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1437570] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diffusiophoresis is the process by which a colloidal particle moves in response to the concentration gradient of a chemical solute. Chemically active particles generate solute concentration gradients via surface chemical reactions which can result in their own motion-the self-diffusiophoresis of Janus particles - and in the motion of other nearby particles - normal down-gradient diffusiophoresis. The long-range nature of the concentration disturbance created by a reactive particle results in strong interactions among particles and can lead to the formation of clusters and even coexisting dense and dilute regions often seen in active matter systems. In this work, we present a general method to determine the many-particle solute concentration field allowing the dynamic simulation of the motion of thousands of reactive particles. With the simulation method, we first clarify and demonstrate the notion of chemical screening, whereby the long-ranged interactions become exponentially screened, which is essential for otherwise diffusiophoretic suspensions would be unconditionally unstable. Simulations show that uniformly reactive particles, which do not self-propel, form loosely packed clusters but no coexistence is observed. The simulations also reveal that there is a stability threshold - when the chemical fuel concentration is low enough, thermal Brownian motion is able to overcome diffusiophoretic attraction. Janus particles that self-propel show coexistence, but, interestingly, the stability threshold for clustering is not affected by the self-motion. Published by AIP Publishing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据